What's the real story here?
I feel like I live in a world where nuance is dead. Everyone
seems to busy taking positions on everything – including me – that sometimes we
forget all about reasoned debate, or about actually arming ourselves with all
the facts. Take for instance the recent decision by apple and facebook to pay
for female employees who choose to freeze their eggs. Predictably, everyone
including me reacted with disbelief and mutters about how companies thought the
best way to get employee loyalty was to pay for them to put off critical life
moments.
However when I thought about it a little more, I realized that
I don’t know whether this is over and above fair or generous parental/
maternity-paternity leave policies. Possibly it is, in which case this is an
additional move targeted at helping employees find the way that works best for
them. Not everyone wants to have a baby in their 20s and 30s, and if some
people want to freeze their eggs and wait for the right timing, and the company
is willing to pay for it, great!
My sister’s firm in the US, for example, has a health
insurance policy that pays for employees who want a sex change operation. Now
does this policy mean that the company is encouraging everyone to change from he
to she or vice versa? Of course not. But if an employee so wishes, the company
is willing to help him or her out. Which is a great HR policy.
My issue with apple and facebook’s new policy would be if
this were in lieu of good parental leave policies, in which case these companies
are clearly taking a misguided shot at what they think will best motivate
talented women to stay on. As of now I don’t know – maybe in the interests of
good PR, these companies should make that public knowledge?
Comments